Welcome to the sci-fi fantasy electronic and alternative opera... For your information, Shhhh! Digital Media is in no way associated with the Salvation Army or any other religious or ideological organization. I myself have no association with them as well. There are people trying to sell you a much different picture of who I actually am and what I'm about than is the truth. I do not live or work in a homeless shelter with all due respect, nor do I live or work in a prison. I am an advocate for the charities represented here on Shhhh! Digital Media, but I am not a volunteer. I choose to do the best I can, where and when I can. I've never worked as a security guard in my life, but it is an honest way to make a living for an honest person, especially if they don't take the identity of other people. Shhhh! Digital Media is not located in New York, or anywhere in the United States, but perhaps once more in my life, I'd certainly like to visit from my home City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. How's that for the business of marketing my home city?

Terms And Conditions

By using this content, you agree to the Terms Of Use disclaimer and our Views Expressed disclaimer.

Wednesday, March 18, 2026

The Hand That Feeds: Weaponized Suggestion Feeds



Before we begin, my name is not Shane and I don't reside or work in a homeless shelter, and I don't use, buy or sell narcotics. 

I don't have brown skin or tan skin either and I say that in protection of my right to identity, as it is a hate crime to replace a person's identity in order to replace their culture or religion or any other aspect of their identity protected by their Human Rights in Canada. The crime isn't my decrying these attempts. The crimes are in the attempts by others themselves. This article is not related to this particular subject, but might be connected by way of an ideological groups that operates in the area of my residence. 

I am not a member of any form of Christianity, Judaism, Islam, Mormonism, Jehovah's Witnesses, Prince Hall or Scientology and I say that with all due respect. I am not a member of the red blue brown team, nor a part of any ideology represented by brown black or blue brown. I am not a member of any pyramid scheme, i.e. a person at the top of a pyramid, being controlled by everyone else on the tiers below them or vice versa.

 

Biomagnetism And Hormones


First of all, I am not possessed by anyone or being remotely controlled either. I never was and never will be not to mention I am not a member of any religion or ideology that believes such nonsense. Abusive ideological groups have a number of ways to manipulate people that are all based upon smoke and mirrors, with the most aggressive and secretive of them being people who've practiced attuning their biomagnetic field in such a way that it can have both positive and negative effects upon another person's nervous system and homeostasis. Homeostasis refers to the balance of hormonal chemistry in a person's body that affects their mood and cognition. How a person perceives the world around them, and if that chemistry is out of whack, it can skew a person's perception of the world, and make them vulnerable to reaction or even fight or flight syndrome. 


I've been writing about this kind of thing for years and have invested countless hours researching and investigating it, though most of my posts including this knowledge have been deleted by me as that information often appeared in one of the rants I chose to delete. However, there is a good record of it in my Butterfly Dragon storyline of The Two Butterflies (which was written by me while operating under the fav.inbox@gmail.com account which is my personal email). There are predatory groups that exist that actually use biomagnetism as a method to attack their enemies and of those groups, there's an even smaller percentage who utilize these methods while under the influence of narcotics such as crack cocaine or methamphetamine to do so. What that translates to is that being attacked in that manner would affect the hormones in your body so that your hormonal balance was similar to that of someone under the influence of such narcotics. The members of these cults that are aware of this refer to it as "blue" or being "blue", and when someone is under that influence, it has become a means to write off anything they reveal about the people attacking them. Its a method of silencing whistle blowers with regard to this activity and its the social architecture of complete morons and idiots bent on destroying society rather than helping it or enlightening others.


The reference to the colour blue comes from the way that Police and criminal investigators use to determine the likelihood of a substance being cocaine, which shows up and glows blue while placed under ultraviolet light. Hence, Blue is word that is used to describe a form of mania that arises when people who use crack cocaine and are part of an ideological group who practice collective biomagnetism as a means to affect and attack others, direct such an attack against a person in their awareness and who lives relatively near them. In the communities where this is commonplace, that is generally how they refer to it, and they use these methods to manufacture and silence whistleblowers by discrediting them.


Online Connection


Given my recent rant, I just wanted to share some insight that might help make others aware of just how much their perception and perspective can be skewed by online sources that offer a computer suggested feed of content (most all of which is often not made by the service itself but its users), and how that content can be commandeered to twist your perception of things and even manipulate how and what you perceive of content producers, and others such as celebrities that appear in many of the media formats you receive that way.


This can be wielded psychologically against you by malicious parties, some of whom might be part of ideological groups acting against your interests, either for personal reasons, or simply out of their own malice and that some of these groups can have members who are employed in system admin positions at such online services, and who can manipulate or affect the logic that is employed to select the suggested content per user, for specific users. People that might be subject to and targeted by this activity definitely include influencers, but could also be directed more generally at a wider audience. Hence, insiders working at such companies can commandeer the suggested content feed that users receive, and use it to both positive or negative results that target the user of that feed, both personally using personal information about them (especially their secrets), and psychologically. The ideological groups that do this are very systematic and employ coordinated techniques to achieve this.


This sort of thing is a far cry from being verbally harassed by groups in person, which takes a lot of strength and resilience to withstand the negative effects of such treatment, but it is traceable and there's evidence, so most people who take part in such activity tend to do it discretely and on the occasions where they step over that line, that leaves an audit trail for criminal investigators, though given the fact that it is so common these days, it is highly unlikely that investigators will ever be able to handle individual cases in a timely manner. Its very clear cut and difficult to disprove as well which works in the advantage of a victim of this activity, however, your hostile reactions to it can be used in the same way by people harassing you, so be mindful. It takes a different kind of strength to deal with hostility of that nature, and most of the people who attack others in that way are cowardly and of little honour or respect for peace and human life.


Suggested Content Feed


Celebrities are rarely directly involved in how their content and appearances are used. Their images, and the video clips in which they're present, are numerous and used by just as many different sources and to different ends, and this is the same or similar with influencers, and others who are visible online and well known. Their image can be used in numerous ways and they are never fully aware of all of the places that it ends up or a part of the artificial narrative that can be created using their image.


Enter: the suggested content feed. Several online content sources such as YouTube (perhaps the most notable) present their content to the users via a feed of suggestions based upon what they're viewed that is of interest to them. The more you watch a particular kind of video, the more you'll get suggestions of videos like that, as well as other videos that are frequently watched by those who like the same kind of videos. This is added to an algorithm that choose content based upon your analytics data from other sources (such as your web browsing activity), and after all of these factors are taken into consideration (along with an AI evaluated and a random element), your content is suggested to you in a feed format that can be scrolled through to see new suggestions. To most users, this feed will seem to be random and related generally to their interests according to the specifications I gave above, but for some, it might have more specific contexts, that seems to target personal aspects about their life.


In such a case, there can generally be two possibilities when that occurs. The first and most convenient way to write it off, is that its an observation selection effect or anthropic bias. The reason that it stands out to you is because your mind is purposely sensitive to extrapolating meaning that is specific to you, from seemingly random content, meaning that you'll have a bias that sometimes can reach and over extend itself towards an implied meaning you're deriving from the content feed, though there is a statistical limit to how often this sort of analysis can be employed to explain such a phenomenon, before it exceeds statistical probability.


The second possibility is that an ideological group has members employed at the online service that you're using, who are twisting the selection algorithm as a means to purposely turn screws in your head, and that is not beyond the realm of possibility, and in all likelihood in many cases, especially those involving popular influencers and those who attract a lot of attention online, is very reasonable to assume that sort of thing might be happening when one notices an inordinate amount of coincidences in the suggestion feed that seem to be sculpting a targeted message towards you. This can both be used to positive and negative effect. However, once you're aware of this, it loses its power over you exponentially.


My concern though is for younger and older people, who don't understand how the underlying technology can be commandeered to achieve such a thing, and hence who can be manipulated and twisted to the point of emotional trauma and the risk of other forms of harmful manipulation that might lead to self harm. 


In the news more and more often, there have been reports of people employed at such services who have after extensive investigations been found to be accessing and sharing their users' information with others online and outside of their workplace. There have also been instances found where this sort of manipulation has been detected in the news feeds of celebrities and politicians and this was one of the  aspects with regard to cases directed against Facebook (which employs a suggested content feed), where it appeared that this sort of technology could be used to influence United States (and presumably those of other countries') voters. I'm telling you this as a Canadian by the way, and the concern was that this sort of technology can be used to manipulate voters without their even knowing, and it could happen anywhere. The same principle applies for any suggested content feed, and ideological groups looking to manipulate certain people are behind much of this activity, and that is becoming more and more apparent as investigations uncover such activity.


To finish the human part of this article, I'd like to emphasize the fact that this is most certainly already happening and in the hands of malicious ideologies and that this might be behind the recent risks that have been discussed in the news and via other online sources. Our awareness of this possibility serves to insulate us from it.


Once again, this same activity could be used to silence whistleblowers and dissenters who expose activities like what I'm experiencing whereby there are groups that take the credit for my content, while disregarding my identity and existence (as if I'm a ghost). And that aspect seems to be very criminal and very real to the point of corruption and the organized crime and ideology protecting it.


I will continue this article with an editorial that was produced by AI according to my specifications, as the AI was able to research and compile a complete article with research citations backing up many of the claims I'm making and indicating the fact that legally, we're still in infancy when it comes to dealing with such problems.



An article by Perplexity AI and Brian Joseph Johns

When Insiders Weaponize the Algorithm: The Hidden Hands Behind Your Feed


Algorithmic feeds are powerful amplifiers, but the deepest danger is not the code itself; it is how determined insiders and outside recruiters can bend that code toward quiet, targeted psychological operations against unsuspecting users. The same systems that can help people discover useful content can, in the wrong hands, become precision tools for harassment, radicalization, or the erasure of inconvenient voices.


Modern platforms already know that ranking algorithms can shift what we believe and prioritize. A recent field experiment on X (formerly Twitter) showed that turning on its algorithmic “For You” feed increased the share of conservative political content people saw and nudged their policy priorities in a more conservative direction over just seven weeks. Large election‑period experiments on Facebook and Instagram similarly show that small changes in how content is ordered can substantially change what political information users encounter, even when their formal party identity does not flip overnight. These are platform‑sanctioned experiments, run at scale, that demonstrate a hard truth: whoever controls the knobs on the feed controls the flow of political reality for millions of people.


Crucially, this influence does not require editing anyone’s vote or hacking a database; it only requires shifting the probabilities of what appears at the top of the screen. By quietly boosting posts from some actors and demoting others, a feed can make certain movements feel energetic and ubiquitous while their opponents look marginal, toxic, or strangely absent. Users experience this not as “manipulation,” but as “what my friends are talking about” or “what’s trending now,” never seeing the counterfactual world where different choices were made.


Security research is increasingly blunt about insider threats: real organizations are seeing employees approached or recruited by outside attackers, not just for money but for political or ideological motives. Surveys of security professionals report that a significant fraction have seen employees contacted to assist in attacks, including ransomware and data exfiltration, and guidance from national cyber agencies explicitly notes that malicious insiders may knowingly abuse their access to cause harm. Insider‑threat frameworks now talk about skills, motives, and opportunities: a technically capable employee who believes the platform is morally corrupt or politically dangerous suddenly looks like a prime candidate for quiet sabotage or “course correction.”


We already have concrete examples of staff abusing privileged tools on major platforms. Facebook, for example, has investigated an employee accused of using internal admin systems to stalk women, exploiting data he could see but ordinary users could not. Security case‑studies describe administrators who used elevated access to spy on colleagues, steal sensitive information, or retaliate against perceived enemies. These incidents are often treated as isolated misconduct, but they prove a structural point: once someone is inside the perimeter with the right privileges, the difference between “routine work” and “targeted abuse” is often just intent.


Combine what we know, and a disturbing, yet technically mundane, scenario emerges. An ideological group decides that the most efficient “psychological operation” is not mass propaganda from the outside, but subtle control from the inside. Instead of just buying ads or running troll farms, it encourages or plants sympathizers into the trust‑and‑safety, data science, or recommender‑engineering teams of one or more platforms. These are precisely the roles that can adjust ranking parameters, define “quality,” tweak toxicity thresholds, and create or override internal labels that determine which posts are boosted, throttled, or flagged.


From there, the operation does not need a cartoonishly obvious “ban my enemies” button. It only needs to re‑weight certain engagement signals or topic scores so that content from rival figures is slightly more likely to be shown in hostile contexts, or more likely to be buried below emotionally charged replies. It can quietly add or adjust internal tags that mark specific communities, hashtags, or domains as “borderline,” “low quality,” or “safety sensitive,” making their posts less likely to reach the top of feeds or to be recommended to new audiences. And it can tune the friend‑ or page‑recommendation system so that people loosely adjacent to the group’s ideology are steered into ever denser networks of allied accounts, while critics are surrounded by content that makes them look unhinged, hateful, or irrelevant.


To the everyday user – or even to a popular influencer – this does not look like an “attack.” It looks like a slow, inexplicable shift: old followers stop seeing their posts, replies become more hostile, growth stalls, and their ideological opponents seem strangely boosted by the algorithm. Targets may suspect shadow‑banning, but without access to internal logs and parameter histories, they cannot prove that a particular human hand nudged the dials.


The danger for ordinary users is not just large‑scale political steering; it is micro‑targeted harm. Because modern recommendation systems rely on detailed behavioral profiles and graph data, an insider with the right access can quietly focus tampering on specific individuals or small clusters (for example, women activists, minority journalists, whistleblowers) by adjusting how often their content is shown and to whom. They can focus on vulnerable users who are already under stress, by promoting more extreme, self‑harming, or rage‑inducing material into their feeds, exploiting known patterns where variable rewards and sensational content keep people hooked. They can target social bridges – those users who connect different communities – by making them appear more volatile or less trustworthy, thereby fraying the edges where dialogue might otherwise cross ideological lines.


None of this requires breaking the recommendation engine; it only requires repurposing it. Algorithmic systems that are good at maximizing engagement and keeping people on the platform are, by design, good at finding what will grab a specific person’s attention or anxiety. In a health‑oriented context, this could mean nudging users toward more exercise videos; in a malicious context, it could mean surfacing more humiliation, outrage, or fear for a chosen set of names.


It is tempting to say “algorithms are to blame,” but that lets human decision‑makers off the hook. The same research that shows feeds can sway political attitudes and behaviors also shows that these systems are adjustable: we can turn features on and off, tighten or loosen ranking rules, and offer non‑profiling alternatives. Regulatory studies in Europe note that platforms often choose manipulative defaults and overwhelming interfaces, not because they must, but because these designs maximize growth and data extraction. That is a business decision, not a technological inevitability.


Insider‑threat research reaches a parallel conclusion: technology provides the means, but motives and oversight determine whether those means are used responsibly. Organizations that treat political neutrality and feed integrity as afterthoughts, or that centralize immense power in small, poorly monitored teams, are effectively trusting that no one with strong ideological commitments will ever abuse their role. That is not a security model; it is wishful thinking.


In other words, recommendation engines are scalpels: they can heal or harm with great precision. The risk is not the existence of the scalpel, but the absence of safeguards on who wields it, under what supervision, and with what accountability when things go wrong.


If we take the possibility of ideological insider psyops seriously, several responses become obvious. Platforms need to treat feed‑ranking logic and internal override tools as critical infrastructure, with strong access controls, four‑eyes changes, and auditable logs for every parameter tweak that can affect political or sensitive content. External researchers and regulators need more visibility into how ranking systems behave around elections and other high‑stakes events, including independent experiments like those already done on X, Facebook, and Instagram. Users deserve meaningful options: genuinely accessible non‑profiling feeds, clear labels when content is boosted or throttled, and explanations of why they are seeing particular posts.


None of these measures will eliminate the risk that a motivated insider might try to twist the system to hurt enemies or advance a cause. But they make it harder to act in total secrecy and easier to detect patterns that deviate from declared policies. They also shift the narrative away from blaming “the algorithm” and toward examining the people and institutions that design, deploy, and oversee these tools.


The technology, in other words, is a mirror: it reflects the incentives and ethics of those who control it. The real danger is not that feeds can be manipulated, but that we continue to build systems where such manipulation is easy, profitable, and largely invisible – and then feign surprise when bad actors step through the door we left open.

Citations:




at

Wow. Big Attack Today...

Big harassment and stalking attack on my person today, so I'll probably delay writing tomorrow and Thursday, instead working on offline projects (TAFIMO) or cleaning up things behind the scenes to make the website more efficient.


To those of you who are enjoying a peaceful and rousing day, I wish you a Happy St. Patrick's Day and Ramadan Kareem.


I might possibly return to writing on Friday.


Have a great day :-)

Brian Joseph Johns ♏

So, in retaliation to the attack, here's some facts to help me clear out the stuff that isn't mine.
So, in retaliation to the attack, here's some facts to help me clear out the stuff that isn't mine.

I'm Canadian and live in Canada, and have never lived in the United States.

I'm an Atheist that leans toward Buddhism and Taoism and Paganism. :-)

My personal connection to the dragon comes from my Welsh ancestry, though much of what inspired the Butterfly Dragon originates from the dragons of Southeast Asia.

I don't reside at or work in the shelter system. A fact for which I'm very grateful, especially in this day and age of predatory ideologies, collectives and groups.

My name is not Bob or Bobby, and switching a person's identity against their will, especially to replace their culture or religion or any aspect about their identity that is protected by their rights is a hate crime. I'm not African or Caribbean or biracially so. Once again, its a hate crime to replace a person's identity to replace their culture or religion or any aspect of their identity protected by their rights.

I'm not a Zionist of any kind and never have been.

I'm not from Nova Scotia and have never been there in my life, though I have one relative who moved there five or six years ago.

Nobody is controlling me and I'm not mentally ill.

I'm not a member of Christianity, nor am I Jewish, nor am I Muslim with all due respect.

I'm not a member of Scientology and never have been.

I'm not a Jehovah's Witness or a member of Prince Hall and never have been.

I'll be celebrating in early April, though not as a fool, nor will I be celebrating Easter. Why would anyone want to join a religion that weaponizes their sins against others, and steals and wears other people's identities, justifying doing so by claiming that the people they do that to have done it to others. On that note, I'm not John Penny, and I've never stolen his identity because I've ALWAYS been attracted to Southeast Asian culture and women, long before I knew him. It seems to me that situation was concocted to give people the impression that Wayne Buttery was my father, when he wasn't, and to force me to the side of the fence away from Southeast Asian culture. So, in other words, for racist reasons and to swap or erase my own identity and history, likely by some eugenics practicing hate group. By the way, I never blamed John Penny for any of this, but I do blame the people who used his situation and mine as an excuse to concoct this entire scam of theirs. Put that in your pipe and smoke it. Oh, I don't smoke by the way and just to be clear, I am NOT on the brown team and never have been. Some abusive and predatory ideologies attempt to force certain people onto the blue side or brown side of the fence, so they can reverse the context of their expression to the opposite. I am not a member of any such cult and never would be. I mean what I say, not the opposite of what I say.

I don't have hepatitis and never have.

I'm neither schizophrenic nor bipolar, but I wouldn't do anything to stigmatize people who have been diagnosed as such.

I don't play guitar and I've never owned a guitar in my life.

I've never hired in (or out) for sex.

I'm not on the blue team, where members of a predatory group attempt to imply a person as being "blue" in order to prevent their words from being taken seriously, or for their words to be regarded as being the opposite of what they mean. Predatory groups often harass and torment people for these reasons, in order to provoke reactions that they claim are hate means love and this is a method such abusive cults use to milk people. I am not hateful, and if I was, it certainly would never mean love and never exceeds my capacity for love, but I don't love people who stalk, harass and otherwise torment other people, especially those who do it as part of abusive collectives, religions or predatory ideologies.

I say what I mean and mean what I say.

I don't use cocaine or crack cocaine or any narcotics and as I stated, I live in Canada and no blue team paid.

I'm not Donald Trump and I'm not from the United States and have never lived there and I'm not a member of any cult that tries to transfer the identity of a person from one person's body to another (another colour symbol for the weaponized version of the colour blue by the way).


I was never really a pirate (one who copies software illegally) per se, and not a pirate courier (one who uploads uncracked software to servers where hackers break the copy protection or download cracked software and redistribute it to other servers). I was a coder of graphics demos, whose work got noticed by the membership of an Elite crew part of a legendary hacker group, and I was recruited (in the 1980s) purely for intros/demos, though I advocated both on my own, and on behalf of said legendary group for student pricing or free student versions of application software, so that low income students (like me at that time) could afford and acquire software education. Generally, the only copied software I've ever been in possession of is that which came with the used computers I've purchased, and often went with the same computer when I sold it to someone else. I am still an honorary member of said group, though rarely if ever communicate with others online in relation to this affiliation. Too many organized community crime networks spying on citizens who would take that information and somehow try to profit by it, or use it maliciously and most citizens likely know exactly what I'm talking about.


I am not a part of a leeching ideology that in exchange for carrying the burden of bits and pieces of a person's life, take the credit for their good efforts. These predatory ideologies and religions are rampant in society today and make up the vast majority of organized crime in communities, using their spy networks not to protect society, but to profit by learning the secrets of others and charging a price to keep them secret for the person they extract them from. So really, they're criminal extortion networks and operate literally in just about every community in most big cities nowadays. These groups operating nearest to my residence and home office have an active monitoring system in several other apartments that illegally monitor my computer and communications and they are NOT law enforcement, and also have ties to some union members who are friendly to their extortion network. These are the people who have been stealing my identity and helping others to steal my creative and intellectual property as well, and they operate with the assistance of other forms of crime in the same community, including those with ties to local and international ideological groups. These groups work with insiders who are secretly employed at various online companies as well, to create an encompassing network of people who basically are criminal extortionists, and who attempt to use what information they gain for their own benefit and the benefit of the ideological groups of which they're a part.

Seeing as their network is rather large, one of the activities they conduct most often is the attempt to convince other members of this illegal eavesdropping and spying network that the computer(s) they're spying on belong to specific people amidst their ideological groups, when in fact they don't belong to any such people. Collectively these groups take the credit for whatever goes on with those computers, while dumping the blame for whatever happens on theirs. Most often this effort targets people racially, in attempt to replace their cultural ancestry with that of another group, which is a hate crime. The effort of that person then goes to fuel members of that community, and efforts are made to isolate the person from other ethnicities (which again is a hate crime). Most of the members of these ideological groups know that I'm European Canadian, but constantly attempt to replace the impression of my culture as being African or Caribbean (doing so is a hate crime), and then attempt to isolate me from members of my own culture, and members of the Asian community. At two points in my life, they stalked girlfriends who were Asian (one was Chinese, the other Korean). They've also stalked other women from my life as well (European). These activities are consistent with those of a racist group, with very strong connections and blatant activity in the community. These are the same groups who operate these secret spying networks that spy on people's computers and mobile devices.

This is the same group that worked towards the ends to give others the impression that my efforts in creating Shhhh! Digital Media were coming from a Guyanese fellow named Bobby, who has nothing to do with Shhhh! Digital Media or its origins. As well, this same spy network has ties to someone in New York, New York, who as well has been attempting to take the authorship and creator's identity of my content. With this spy network, there are likely others who have been for years stealing my content and claiming it as their own. This also occurs in other places in the same city and as I stated, is a rampant activity and blatantly criminal. Its not law enforcement. It also has ties to various sex trafficking networks locally as well, and frequently tries to associate my person and identity with such activity (probably given my last name, which some would argue means the plural of those who are customers of prostitutes).


Now consider that I don't ghost ex-girlfriends ie I don't just disconnect from them on purpose at all. If you read between the lines, you'll see that what these abusive predatory ideologies did to me, they tried to do to some of my ex-girlfriends to keep them away, while they attempted to associate me with other women who are friendly to their ideology, and their ideological network. As I stated, they did this to a Chinese woman who was my ex, a Korean woman, and a few European women with whom I was in a relationship, all to make sure that they were isolated from me and then to associate me with completely different women and lifestyle, making me seem like I rely upon sex traffickers for my love life, which is not the case and never has been. The members of these predatory ideologies use other people to take out their dirty laundry. Substitutes. I'm most likely one of the substitutes and they make that process very, very difficult on the substitute, but not on the one whose laundry it is. To some of them, this is a form of alchemy, and in doing so, they believe that you as the substitute, get a piece of that person's soul. That's the kind of thing we're dealing with here. The same ideology will take bits and pieces of their target's life in much the same way to give to someone else.

To cover up their activity, the members of the groups who operate in communities will actively work to discredit the target whenever they are out and about in the community. Their goal is to make the target appear either under the influence of narcotics, of to appear to be mentally ill. Both impressions will drastically affect how people regard the truths their victims reveal, because these ideologies want to keep their activities from being subject to criminal investigation. To give others these impressions about their target, they keep a watch on their target nearly 24/7, and any time they predict their target will go out into the community, they're stalked and often harassed by members of the ideological group who permeate the community. The idea is to draw a reaction from the target that lures them into a rant when they're by themselves (most targets like myself are purposely are isolated). So the idea is to make it appear that the victim is mentally ill or unstable or on narcotics, and the rest of the community unaware of this activity will generally write the victim off. Also, the membership of these ideologies operate under the idea that they can connect two people and that one can remotely control the other, and generally speaking, they give this impression in order to fool others in the community into going along with the entire scam and most of it is directed at stealing the output of their victim, while burdening them with the worst of someone else. The more they do this, the more traumatizing it is, and the more it is used to escalate the reactions of the victim towards unruly behaviour or even hate. The more these ideological groups get away with it, the more likely it is that they're be able to radicalize their victim towards hateful or extreme behaviour, which they use to slowly push towards the end of lawlessness, when in fact these groups are intricately involved in sex trafficking and narcotics trafficking, and considering that these are the same people running the surveillance network, that is an extremely dangerous prospect for the community.


In my case, they're trying to keep me bound as someone who has a "brown fetish" and hired brown prostitutes, though I've never had such a fetish before in my life. This is connected to their hate group in the sense that they initiate members into their group by forcing them to keep a secret about something related to the colour symbolism of the colour brown (the symbolism for the colours is brown black). The hate group force others with a different skin colour, to keep the secrets of those with brown skin, and then make those secrets as heavy as possible for their victims. The community stalking towards those ends is all geared in this direction as well, and might be used to clear other people of garbage of this nature through one person, another common activity in the community, though it is a racist group that is practicing this activity, who see it as a way of subverting other cultures with different skin colour other than brown. Some of these activities are linked to the colour symbolism used by outlaw gangs to initiate members. The idea is that they make someone else carry the weight of the colour symbolism in that regard, and the initiated gang member benefits from it, without ever having to experience what was required to earn that colour or patch.

This same ideological group and gang will claim that I'm possessed by someone from the United States in gang territory or some other nonsense of that ilk to cover up what I'm revealing, when in fact I'm Canadian and live in Toronto, but I don't hate Toronto and I am not a member of any religion or ideology that does love and hate as a thing. Hate groups would harass a person though if they want to make that person the hate side and someone else the love side, and hate groups are known for this, and radicalizing the people they target in ways to create behaviour that betrays their life and career and that is exactly what is going on here and these people are attempting to take their garbage out through substitutes, and most of that garbage is related to sex trafficking and narcotics, and then ganging up on someone of whom they're jealous, and trying to harm their life and career (after having attempted such a thing many times over before). They want their hero to be someone who is Christianity, and they want it to be someone who they've forced to forgive them about more misgivings, than they're had to forgive misgivings of them, because they believe that if that is out of balance, then the side that got away with more will control the other side. Its a power play that many people aren't aware of within the aspects of what is called aggressive religious conversion, and that is why in some places in the world, religions that practice aggressive conversion are outlawed. Needless to say, I'll never become a member of  Christianity as a result of my experiences and I'll never forgive those who subject me to those experiences. I can only hope that the more that people become aware of this, the greater the likelihood of it being prevented or outright stopped. They want a Christian figure head, not a non-Christian figure head.  The thing is that I never really held any contention with any religion before I started experiencing this activity, so you could say they created it. Systematically. I'd bet there are many others who are victims, and that my speaking up will help alleviate some of the pressure that has been hurting them out of fear that they were alone.


I am not a member of Christianity at all and not on the blue team or the brown team.


My name is not Shane, but I have a good friend nicknamed "Shayne", who has rank.


No Princess or 85 River Street and no brown secret (i.e. brown black) and no heb. Those things will never be welcome back in my life whatsoever from this point forward.


I am the writer of everything on this website and creator and owner of Shhhh! Digital Media.


I'm not Irish or Italian or Scottish with all due respect and I'm not African, Jamaican, Caribbean or Guyanese as much so as I'm not biracial African, Jamaican or Caribbean or Guyanese with all due respect.


The people who often attempt to steal Shhhh! Digital Media are centered around a particular person to whom they give the credit for everything that I do here, and most often, that person has brown skin, or is a part of the group who assist them in taking my efforts from my person. Now keep in mind that they've been doing this for more than three decades, and I've for the most part sat on it without saying a thing and throughout that time, they also harassed me, thinking that they were somehow possessing me or even remotely controlling me, which further gave them the impetus to setup their illegal monitoring network and to use these methods to literally steal the credit for the intellectual and creative property of others. The entire time I was writing this post, the same group were bullying me from other residences and these are people who don't work or even try to work. They don't volunteer (but they want me to carry the weight of volunteers with crack cocaine habits or to pay volunteers by giving them the credit for my work and advocacy on Shhhh! Digital Media). Basically, they're members of a group who literally around the clock harass me, and any time I've reported this activity, it gets attribute to someone else's life, as if it didn't happen to me, but instead happened to that other person. That's the corruption that protects this. They also attempt to label me as a Jehovah's Witness or Prince Hall, which I've never been a member in my life of either organization in my life. These people were specifically put around me for this purpose as well and are protected in doing this, and that appears to be the nature of this beast and organized crime. Everyone else they've done this too eventually broke and assaulted someone. I've been going fairly strong for decades, and haven't ever crossed that line, but that doesn't mean that it doesn't wear on me. These people are racists who are opposed to my being European Canadian and having light skin, and having a love interest who is Southeast Asian. Instead, they're trying to force me over to the brown skin side of the fence, or the side of the fence of a person who is of mixed brown culture with someone of a light skinned culture. Now I have nothing against mixed culture relationships or children (I've got about four or five cultures in my ancestry), but I won't allow myself to be tormented by a group who are trying to replace my identity and give the credit for my words to other people as if I don't exist. These people are part of a brown racist group, that make other people like myself pay them by stealing the credit for my work and then harassing me knowing that if I protest this, that it makes me appear like a racist when I'm not.


The blue team and the brown team of this particular ideology tend to express and remember everything as the opposite of what they meant or how something happened. So if for instance, you intervened to prevent a fight between two people, they might remember it as you having started a fight between two people, or you and someone else being ready to fight, and one of them having prevented the fight. Everything they say and remember tends to operate on that concept. So if you were assaulted by someone, you'd be remembered as the person who did the assaulting, if they were asked about it. If you stuck up for and protected a woman against some form of aggression, you'd be remembered as the one who subjected the woman to aggression, and they would have been the ones who stopped it. This is generally in my experience how abusive and predatory ideologies, and organize crime coordinate their alibies where it involves more than one perpetrator versus one or two targets/victims. Also, they might label you as a Jehovah's Witness if you're alone when such a situation does occur, and that would confine you according to how these predatory ideologies operate, to the two witness rule, where you need a second witness to be considered to be telling the truth. Otherwise, your account, even to the authorities (who are in on this) is completely ignored, and its regarded as having happened to someone else, and you're just delusional and believe it happened to you. Even if there's material evidence its covered up. No, I'm not possessed or being controlled by anyone else and delusional about these things happening to me. They really do, and predatory ideologies use the means I'm exposing to cover it up and that doesn't make me a conspiracy theorist either. Conspiracy is actually a criminal charge, and many of these crimes are conspiracies. Criminal Conspiracy: Defined under section 465 of the Criminal Code as an agreement to commit a crime or achieve an unlawful purpose. What I'm revealing is very real and happening in Regent Park, Toronto, Ontario, Canada. I love Canada, but not when I'm treated like this. I'm not saying the opposite of what I mean. I'm saying exactly what I mean. Youtube admins actually assist this cult, though not all. Probably very few, but there are some who do and actually share info about my youtube viewing activities with people locally in the community who are part of this predatory ideology and who are trying to replace my cultural ethnicity to replace my skin with brown or tan skin (ie African or Caribbean or biracial African or Caribbean when I'm neither). There are admins on other services as well who assist this predatory group to give the credit of my content to other people and regard me as not existing at all. In Canada, as it would be in most places in the world, doing these things is considered a hate crime.


The members of this cult also prefer it when their targets use emails that don't contain their real name. That's because the members of these predatory ideologies operate under the assumption that everything that their target/victim does belongs to the group, not the individual, and they essentially try to trap people into this way of doing things and in my experience, the benefit for doing so only flows in one direction: theirs and never yours. They're all take and no give, and the only give that they are, is the weight of their burden, which they purposely make very heavy on purpose as they believe its a way to subvert their target. In a sense to own them. So in my case, they could be attacking me very heavily because they're trying to provoke reactions that ruin my identity and name, so that I'll be forced to operate under my gmail account email which is fav.inbox@gmail.com, because it has no definitive name associated with it, and therefore they can claim it belongs to anyone, which is part of their scam. These are people who've stolen intellectual and creative properties before. One of the developers and patent holders of the IMAX camera was even targeted by this group and almost had their role in developing the camera stolen from them and that is a true story. This is a group that targets people they suspect will present a high payoff in terms of intellectual and creative property theft.

No roses for me. I'd prefer it if this information ended up in the awareness of all instead of covered up. 

I don't have a dog by the way. One of the members of this predatory ideology on my floor has a dog, and they want other people to believe that in my typing this, that I am that person rather than myself, Brian Joseph Johns. That person is likely connected to the organized crime and the predatory group.

And no blow for me.



at

Very Happy About EU News...

I just wanted to put up a quick post to say that I'm ecstatic about the news of Canada joining the EU. 

That is completely awesome and just makes sense!

Great job Mark and fellow Canadians!

My rant about being harassed still stands, but this news goes a long way to lifting my spirits.

The timing of the harassment attack was probably geared toward the ends of drawing ire and negativity from me, while everyone else was likely celebrating. I can't stress enough how abusive and aggressive such harassment has been, while at the same time being participated in or ignored by the community. I feel really betrayed and will take measures to deal with that. It was probably done simply because I made an attempt to reconnect with my Facebook account, where most of my family and some of my friends are, though blue and brown are the furthest things from my state of being, except where it means independence, work, business, intelligence, strength, science and medicine. I think I've made it clear where my boundaries stand, especially in that last post.

Regardless, I'll be taking time to enjoy this news soon with a proper celebration.

I'll be back again on Friday with more new content.

Brian Joseph Johns

No blue team or brown team for me.

at