Sunday, April 14, 2019

An Example Of How Illegal Eavesdropping Can Be Misused...

Brian Joseph Johns
Hi. This post isn't really a gripe. Its a great example of how illegal surveillance or eavesdropping by neighbours or a cult operating within a community can be misused by such groups.

Case in point:

A few days ago, I had watched a video on my phone relating to ancient Sumerian tablets and texts. I'm interested in history and I like to hear a wide variety of opinions on the topic of the interpretation of ancient languages. As a disclaimer, I am not a Jehovah's Witness nor am I a member of Prince Hall, nor a Mormon or a Fundamentalist Latter Day Saint. I'm also not a member of any form of Christianity, Islam or Scientology at all though I mean no disrespect in stating so.

Secondly I don't know or socialize with anyone in my building of residence or community. I really don't know people from the community, partly as a result of their stalking and other abusive behavior of that nature. Not nearly everyone is that way and if fact they're by far the minority, but that minority are far more vocal abusive than the ones who aren't leaving a person like myself with the need to be vocal about such social abuse and stalking.

Anyway, back to the Sumerian tablets. So this particular interpretation dealt with the idea that the originators of the human species were from outer space and an as of yet undiscovered planet within our solar system called Nibiru.

It deals with the Annunaki (an alleged race of giants from the sky) who seeded humankind as a work force to conduct their labour for them. Within this interpretation it regarded that the male genome came from these Annunaki and that the female genome came from indigenous animals (most likely our primate ancestors such as homo habilus and homo erectus).

Regardless, I listened to the whole explanation but didn't really give it much credence. To me it sounded like a similar attempt at laying the whole burden of early humanity on women, while elevating men to the status of gods. Something with which I have contention in the Bible as well though if you look into other early Jewish texts such as the Zohar, there is a divine feminine (called the Shekinah). Its unfortunate that such an early blow was dealt to women in our history. I my feelings are reflected here with regard to that issue especially in the A Lady's Prerogative line of stories and books.

So not long after having watched that video and considering its interpretation, the abuse that I'd experienced a week prior from my neighbours and members of the Regent Park community started up once again seemingly from out of nowhere.

The whole idea is that this cult spied me watching this video and for that reason assumed that I accepted its theory as fact, and because that theory contradicts my line of reasoning here at Shhhh! Digital Media, that they could one again take my identity from me as having created this site and what's contained here, while unloading the identity of people who have little regard for women onto my person. As I've stated before, this is a cult that steals the output of other people and transfers it to their allies and friends, most often to pay for their crimes or social abuses. While doing this, they often abuse the person from whom they took that output.

In fact, this cult believes that anytime you do something good, its the result of being possessed by their spirit. Ie their spirit goes body jumping into other people's bodies and makes them do good things. So if this is the case, then why don't they do good things when they're in the body they originated from because usually the burden they transfer to others is related to things most people don't engage in. Like I've said many times, I don't use, buy or sell narcotics at all. I am happy to see that cannabis was legalized in Canada, but I don't even use that or smoke for that matter. I'm 51 years old. I'm looking to take my health in a better direction.

So that leaves me having to explain and expose how illegal surveillance and eavesdropping is used and abused by community groups. Its not like I'm a pedophile or anything of that nature. The crime here is that people are using surveillance of their neighbour's internet for the purposes of stealing their creative or intellectual output and most of the people who do this are committing a serious crime.

So no, I don't believe that women are dogs or any animal for that matter and as a matter of fact, given the nature of the issue that men have nipples, I'd say that women were the originating genome for us all, because their are no use for nipples on the physically male of our species, indicating that the male of our species evolved from the female. So many interpretations of ancient texts fail to take this fact into consideration and because not many people speak up about this issue, it tends to fall flat upon women as being the blame for the downfall of humanity or for original sin or as originating from dirty animals or something of that nature. The truth is that we both come from the same origins and that women were the first of that genome.

Also please note that I don't like builders who operate by puppetry. I much prefer Cowans in this sense. By puppetry, I mean builders that attempt to attach puppet strings to other people in order to manipulate them into following or reacting to a set of circumstances. Such people often claim the credit for far too much in society, as they believe that all good arises from their puppetry of others. Its just the same as people who believe that all good arises from bad, and all love arises from hate and that if you make bad or hate that you in essence are controlling the creation of good and love. That's nonsense.

So nothing I've written in this post is the result of puppet strings at all. In fact, I'm trying to liberate people from such ideologies or from groups of people who facilitate such means of manipulating others. So see how illegal surveillance is used by other people, most often civilians but sometimes disgustingly by people who are sworn under oath to protect us? That's a power I'd rather not see misused.

So regardless, my stance is still the same no matter what I listen to or watch. Oh and by the way, I'm not Dwayne Johnson with all due respect. Great performer, but I'm not him and he's not me though my love interest still originates from the Far East of Asia though from the social abuse that I endure I doubt that I'll be in any shape to be with her anytime soon.

Just to get an idea of what social abuse is really about, consider that it is about throwing a victim off b balance. Either to the side of being really really good or really really bad rather than a tiny bit of each. That way if the victim is polarized to the really really good side of the fence, their opposite is usually someone really really bad, who can literally get away with doing something really really bad to them (or someone else), the logic being that if that's the side of the fence you're on, go with it.

So in such a case, if someone attempts to polarize you to one extreme, I'd say watch your back. Maybe they're winding up to do something really really bad to you, or possibly they might polarity reverse things and you'll be regarded as the really really bad side of the fence, in which case you'll end up burdened with the worst social burden that they can find.

Their side of the fence is that by me standing up for women or any issue for that matter, that I'm trying to hog all of the attention and benefits of doing this for women.

I have two responses to that.

Firstly, what benefits? I depend upon social assistance to support me because I cannot earn enough to survive because I'm stalked by socially abusive people. Also because of this, I don't socialize or date at all and quite honestly I'm committed to my memory of a past romance with a Mandarin Chinese lady. Most people would have no idea of who I am if I was standing right in front of them. In fact, in my community, its a game for people to steal the online identity responsible for what I say and do online so that they can look good for women's rights or anything that A Lady's Prerogative represents.

Most of the time, the socially abusive cult steals my identity, or claims that when writing, I'm completely possessed by someone else to whom they give the credit. So essentially I do all of the foot work and writing, and the credit for it is stolen from me and I'm kept jobless and single to the point of struggling to keep this roof over my head and avoid ending up homeless once again, where the exact same thing will happen. So there literally is no benefit for myself except doing the right thing.

Secondly, if I don't speak up when I become away of such issues, nobody else speaks up but rather they just remain silent even knowing the same facts that I do. For those people that have an idea of what I might be onto, they use my lack of forthcoming effort to stand against it, whatever it might be as a justification to put related social burden onto me and then justify stealing anything good I've done in the past that contradicts my lack of words or action.

So essentially they just steal from you whatever you say and do rather than taking a chance of speaking out themselves. In fact, if they steal it from you, they'll give it to the credit of someone else they're trying to prop up as an icon of some form even though that person did nothing for those causes or issues. So to this socially abusive cult, its all about taking what one person takes the risk of saying and then applying it to someone else's credit if it works out good or letting it remain with the person who said it if it works out for the worse.

Such an ideology brainwashes people into complicity, and targets those who make a stand or effort that might rock the boat. I try to keep one foot on each side of the fence to keep balance, but I don't hold my tongue or efforts when I feel it is necessary to speak or make effort towards something needing change or attention. Most of the people who get involved in the abusive side of this are of the ilk whereby they build their icons by means of puppet strings, which are most often situations setup to pressure their victim to act (or conversely not to act). These puppet strings are often situations that cause stress for the victim should they become known. They almost always setup purposely to achieve this goal and often far in advance. That's why I stated, I don't believe that builders who try to use puppet strings are real builders. They're abusive phonies most often. I much prefer Cowans.

The solution to this isn't as simple as getting a job. That's because even if you do, you'll soon end up stalked and sabotaged and before long unemployed again by my experience. If you protest, you're labeled as a complainer. This cult sorts out who gets the credit for what according to their positivity and negativity, their membership by way of the symbolism of colours and a variety of other means. This cult only regard their victims as cows. A source of output from which to steal and take the credit. As I've stated, this cult insofar as I've seen plans this far in advance, I'm talking decades. I don't think that they've encountered someone who became enlightened to their methods as thoroughly as I have and for this reason, I'm likely a threat to them because I have no fear of exposing such an ideology that steals the efforts of other people in such a way.

Anyway, I'm glad that I did speak up, but no, my love interest didn't suddenly magically appear before me and I didn't suddenly become the same age I was when we'd last seen each other (38), and we didn't get back all of that lost time. There is literally no benefit for myself in speaking up on those matters but it certainly helps women. I'll probably end up dying alone and broke and possibly in a relatively short time span from now because no matter how robust I am, I don't think that I can last much longer at 51 years of age against such abuse. This cult seems fixated on my love interest being Italian rather than from the Far East Of Asia. The truth is that she is from the Far East Of Asia and I'll likely never see her again thanks to this cult.

I don't use, buy or sell narcotics by the way. I drink occasionally but seldom still. I'm in alright shape but its gradually going downhill and their abuse is catching up with me in many ways. Emotionally in terms of depression and hopelessness. That's a sympathy plea at all, its just the truth. Maybe when the sun comes out a bit more in this spring I might have a bit of energy.

I'll try writing a bit more tomorrow night (Tuesday night April 16, 2019) with my dinner and a few drinks.

I'm not sure why I keep writing, coding, composing or doing graphics. Its not like its going to mushroom into a career or financial independence or anything like that. Abusive people in my community regularly try to steal whatever I work on or create and wear it as if it came from them, while abusing the crap out of me.

What's the point in doing it? No wonder more and more people are becoming radicalized. Its likely the result of this abusive ideology and its spread throughout society. I mean they may not have their hands on the trigger, but that doesn't mean that they aren't just as guilty of causing murder by their methods of radicalization and polarization.

I guess they lucked out when they found me because there's no chance of me going on a murder spree to deal with this abusive social ideology. I'd much rather catch it legally and with the rule of the law, the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and the Human Rights Act. That doesn't mean that I am way on the "good" side at all. It just means that I have balance. People that would steal your creative efforts and output for their own claim are close to the lowest in my books. Likely an abusive ideology looking for people with "Cain" blood or something of that nature, meaning people who react with harshness or violence when tested by the membership of this cult.

That's why there's the rule of law and not the rule of religion. We all have the right to belief, the right to express that belief but not the right to infringe the rights of others with the rules of our beliefs.

Its alright that there's people that believe that we're an amalgamation of different spirits, one for each of our habits and behaviors. According to such a belief, if you really like to read then you'd have a spirit called "read". If you really like to "exercise" then you'd likely have a spirit called exercise. According to such a belief you can have more than one such spirit at a time, for instance you could have both the "read" and "exercise" spirit. Our bad habits also apparently come from spirits as well. So if you smoke, you might have a "smoke" spirit. If you get angry or depressed often, you might have an anger "spirit" or "depressed" spirit in you.

According to such a belief, with the help of the people who believe this, these spirits play a game of musical chairs at night, jumping from body to body through a global collective consciousness. The next day, the members of this belief then spend the day hunting for all of these spirits within other people. This culminates in abusive treatment and often stalking on the part of the believers against those they think might be possessed by these body jumping spirits. The fact that there are people who believe this is completely in line with the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and the Human Rights Act. The fact that there are believers in this that go out and violate other people's rights in order to hunt these disembodied spirits down is a violation of the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and the Human Rights Act. That's an example of what I'm talking about and that particular religion is not something of which I'm a part and is something of which I'll never be a part. I think that law enforcement should be investigating the effects of this ideology upon people, because I think that this is precisely what is leading to violent mass murder attacks because over time, it is a form of radicalization.

Here's another example of a belief that violates a person's rights and often leads to the same sort of radicalization.

There's another belief where in order to be considered to be alive, one must pay for and borrow the identity of someone else, especially whereby you are using a skill or talent that you cannot prove where how you acquired that skill or talent. In other words, if there's no public record of you education in that manner, or members of this belief can't find it, they simply assume that you must pay for someone else's identity in order to be able to use that skill or talent or even to claim that you have such a skill or talent. In other words, being able to successfully do it isn't good enough.

So such a group criminally extorts you, forcing you to pay for the identity of someone else who must act as a sponsor for your talent or skill. If you have no such sponsor, then it is considered by the believers of this ideology that you are stealing the skill from someone else without paying them for it. I don't mean that you're stealing the end output resulting from having that skill. I mean that you're stealing the actual skill from someone else, psychically or spiritually or something of that nature that consequently cannot be proven in a court of law.

In such a case, the believers of this ideology will steal anything and everything that you produce with that skill and credit it to members of their ideology as payment for the use of that skill. If you don't have a sponsor, you're not allowed to use that skill or talent.

This even extends as far as to apply to elements of your own identity. For instance, your address, your birthdate, your astrological sign and any of your personal property and even your entire identity and even if you have Government documentation confirming all of that information. The membership of this ideology will still deny you your own identity or even take it for their own along with anything produced by you and charge you a price for it that requires you to have sponsorship amongst the membership of their ideology. If you don't coincide with this criminal extortion and this ideology happens to have a large enough following within the area you live, you'll likely exist in your area without your own identity as it will be worn by others in this ideology who will take it from you as payment for their sponsorship.

In the Canadian criminal code, that's called criminal extortion. Extortion doesn't apply just to money. It applies to anything forcefully requested in payment for a service whether rendered or not that denies the victim of anything of their own belonging as a result of not paying for the service or goods. Anything that forces you to pay for sponsorship to be recognized as having a specific skill or talent or ability or a quality of your identity is also criminal extortion. I'm not a Police Officer by the way, but this information can be found in the Canadian Criminal Code. If people are violating your rights this way and nothing is being done about it, that doesn't mean that what they're doing is right or even legal.

I believe that there are many people whose rights are being regularly infringed upon by such ideologies that eventually blow up and just take the law into their own hands, often taking innocent lives in the process.

What really ramps this up is the fact that the people who victimize certain people in this manner, even steal the victimization and apply it to other people. That is, the victim of this sort of thing often has their victimization stolen from them where it is applied to someone else's life. Whatever harm or damage caused by this activity is completely denied by the same ideology that perpetrated it and the damages are paid to the person to whom the stolen victimization was applied.

I'd be willing to bet that is also a factor in the recent spate of murder sprees.

One last ideology goes by the idea that whenever we make effort towards any goal, we are actually possessed by someone else, presumably from our past who is at the controls as it were, driving us much like a car. In fact, we're possessed of all of these different people whom we've been inspired by in our past and that anything that we accomplish before we've been purged of these possessions is the result of the spirits of these people.

The process of removing these spirits from us involves the symbolism of colours and a lot of abuse by the believers of this ideology, who are looking to take these spirits from others because they believe that without them, we are incapable of anything. So using colour symbolism and harassment and abuse geared towards making the victim from whom they're extracting these spirits appear to contradict anything to do with their identity, the believers of this ideology remove these spirits one by one and transfer them to other people. The people that they extract these spirits from are literally regarded as not being capable of anything and often are forced to pay for the spirit of others much like the above extortion scheme I described.

The amount of abuse and harassment it takes to remove these spirits from someone is staggering and literally destroys the life of the victim from whom they're taken. The abuse is geared towards making the victim miserable and hateful if at all possible and often goes on for many years. This too is a candidate for an ideology that likely results in radicalization of the victim, especially if they have no idea of what's going on and no support from civic society or the legal system. Once again I'd be willing to bet that this is a likely method by which a victim is radicalized to the point of a violent attack against the public. Unfortunately none of the members of such an ideology ever accept the responsibility for their contribution to such treatment of a victim. That is certainly not to say that the solution is to go on a murder spree and kill as many people as possible but even that has a cause, and if effort was spent investigating that aspect of such cases, I'd be willing to bet that you'd find one of these ideologies at its root because these ideologies seem to have free reign to destroy the lives of their victims.

It must feel good to be a part of something so abusive and to know that you've caused the murder of numerous people, often those who are innocent of any involvement in such an ideology.

Personally my favourite ideology and the one that I follow is this one:

Take responsibility for your own words and actions.

I am also a Taoist and Buddhist though I don't believe in collective consciousness.

Within my building and living space, I'm often treated as someone else's identity. That is the members of this abusive ideology mistreat me for the actions of someone else who I'm certainly not. Usually its someone who has some involvement with crack cocaine or other narcotics, and a rampant list of sexual partners in the building and in the community as well despite the fact that I don't use, buy or sell narcotics and its been almost nine years since the last time I had any sexual contact with a partner of any kind. This is the same ideology and cult that does the identity theft and swapping and are quite rampant in Regent Park. Also they attempt to swap my identity with that of someone from the Jane and Finch area despite the fact that I don't know anyone from that area.

As I said, I don't know or have friends in the Regent Park community and actually I probably only have about 2 friends of mine that are left in Toronto. Most others and my family have all left Toronto for elsewhere. I guess there's elements here that try to socially cannibalize people, taking parts of the history of other people and wearing it as their own. They seem to disconnect their victims from all other people first and then they dig in to their victim's life.

Even their computer spying is used to give the credit for anything good that comes from my three computers to other people in the building, or in the community while the members of this cult try to apply their piracy or other criminal related computer activity to me despite the fact that I don't do anything of that nature. They're always trying to apply the identity of someone Italian or someone Irish to me when in fact I'm neither. I think that it has something to do with their colour symbolism (related to the colours blue and brown). They're racist in the sense that they are against me having a Mandarin Chinese or any love interest from the Far East Of Asia despite the fact that my love interest is someone with whom I've prior been in a relationship. I think they're against Caucasian people being in such relationships so they do everything that they can to prevent them. I think that his has something to do with colour symbolism once again, which seems to be the biggest element of how their racist ideology operates. They don't allow relationships that break the rules of their colour symbolism as it relates to blood and in fact, they try to force relationships or the impression of relationships that are in line with their rules for the mixing of culture. Its difficult to speak of this without sounding racist myself, but the truth is that it is their racism, not mine. The truth is that they want me to be with someone that keeps me tied to African blood (because of my having French heritage) rather than me being in a relationship with someone of Chinese, Korean, Japanese, Vietnamese or Thai descent. This cult has rules about that and yet I am not a member of it or any religion that operates in that way. So this is a group once again violating my rights in favour of the rules of their religion of which I am not a member.

As I stated above, I believe in everyone's right to believe as they choose, but nobody has the right to violate the human rights of others according to the rules of their religion (or any other reason). This is a big problem in Regent Park right now but if you make waves, you'll be targeted for stalking and abuse by certain cultures who are most certainly attempting to draw a racist reaction from their victims in order to turn the tables. This is an unfortunate circumstance and is causing a great deal of problems both in Regent Park and likely other places in Canada and the United States I'd be willing to bet.

Because of the difficulty in dealing with this problem, many people turn to blogs in order to attempt to describe it and end up sounding like racists themselves or come very close to breaching Canada's anti-hate speech laws. If you do so online, then this cult attributes your statements to someone American so that you are not subject to Canada's anti-hate speech laws but in the process you lose your online identity. So once again this is about identity theft of anything good associated with a person's online efforts and attributing them to someone else.

The ironic part is that the people who conduct the abuse are actually guilty of criminal harassment but are never investigated (or charged). If you are a victim of this sort of thing, you have to be very careful about how you explain it and how you deal with it. In most cases as long as you stick to the truth and sincerity you'll be alright. In my case this targeting is because the group is racist against certain mixed culture relationships that violate their rules of cultural mixing and mingling. These people want the people they abuse to be the fuel for their lives, and not to share their good with members of the Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese or Thai community. In fact, this cult prefers to use those cultures as their garbage bags. That is, this cult attempts to dump their social burden onto members of those cultures through someone who is in a mixed culture relationship with someone of the target culture. When you catch them on this, they claim that its "hate means love" (which ironically is exactly how one goes about dumping their garbage onto others). That's called "blue love" and a person partaking of that is called a "blue rose" or sometimes even a "gun".

We share our social burden and whatever is on our palette (events from our own life and what we've inadvertently inherited from other people) with those that we love. If love and hate are reversed, then we share what's on our palette with those we treat hatefully. If you have mostly good things on your palette, and you are doing blue love, then you'd most likely treat your true lover hatefully in order to share your good with them. If you have mostly bad on your palette, then you'd treat others whom you wanted to dump that burden onto hatefully. Doing this is called being a "gun".

Often, members of this cult who are opposed to mixed culture relationships with members of the communities originating from the Far East Of Asia use this method to dump their burden onto members of the those communities. In fact, some of the more racist ones refer to that as "Chinese food".

This cult carefully monitors everything that the people they use as guns to see what colours that person is interacting with in order to define their most current colour. That means the software that you interact with and its logo colours. So interacting with facebook would put you on the blue white team, because of its logo colour. Locally if this cult defines blue white as being a "gun" or a "blue rose", then that means that people that you interact with will likely not be burdened with whatever is on your palette (because in such a case hate means love and love means hate, and you don't share anything with those you hate unless you're on the purple team, which often means that love and hate are the same thing). I'm not a member of the purple team and I don't believe that love and hate are the same thing. Love is freedom. Hate isn't. They're not the same. I've explained the reasoning behind that numerous times and it is sound reasoning. If anything I believe that there's nothing wrong with any mixed culture relationship between two people of any gender so long as it involves consenting adults. That's what my purple means. I'm heterosexual but I support LGBTQ relationships in the same regard and that's why I said any gender, not just a man and a woman.

So people who feel differently than what I've expressed above are very much against certain mixed culture relationships. For instance, its alright for someone African to be with someone Chinese, but not someone Caucasian, or specifically according to this cult, its not alright for me for whatever reason and there is no good reason. In order to dance on this issue the members of this cult will stir up conflicts of this nature, I'll make a few accusations about their nature, they'll dance for a few days carefully avoiding being labeled as being guilty of those accusations just long enough to avoid being "shot" (if I happen to be defined as being a gun at that point) and once there's no risk, the cult goes back to the exact same behavior as they did before the accusation.

So the membership of this cult wants to deny me my own identity and to prevent me specifically from being in a mixed culture relationship that doesn't fit the rules of their cult despite the fact that I am not a member. That's because they want to take anything good resulting from my efforts here and apply them to members of their cult, rather than having me share that good with people that I choose because this cult wants it to fuel their lives and they'd rather take it from me than allow me to choose to share it with them because they don't want it to be shared with other cultures and ideologies except for their own whereas I'd rather share with people on the basis of their worthiness for it.

Their abuse of me is purposeful because if they can push me onto the blue team by breaking down every other colour, and they define the colour blue as hate means love, if they abuse me and I react with anger towards them, I'm sharing all of this site and anything else from my life with them, and the people that I claim to love and admire end up getting nothing, because love means hate in this case. That's essentially how this cult operates. So they really don't want anyone else to have it except themselves and they don't want the person who creates it to have a say in who shares in it. That's the truth of it. So in other words, they don't want me sharing anything good that comes of this site, my stories or anything else that I produce going to members of the Far East community, in Canada or anywhere for that matter. So my gripes are all about speaking out against that activity because that activity is actually hate speech, which means I'm defending the Charter Of Rights And Freedoms and the Human Rights Act of Canada, my country of residence.

This cult instead wants other people to believe that it comes from someone else other than myself so they have control of what I produce. The members of the Far East community aren't racists in this way, so why is this cult being that way?

Suffice it to say that I'm not a Jehovah's Witness and I'm not a member of Prince Hall though I say that with all due respect. Likewise I am not a Mormon and not a Fundamentalist Latter Day Saint. I am not Muslim. I am not a Scientologist. I am not a member of the Salvation Army either. I believe in everyone's right to believe any of the aforementioned religons but nobody has the right to violate the human rights of any other person utilzing the rules of these or any other religion or ideology.

In essence, the cult want to break down the bias of love or affection that their victim has for those they care about and to trick the victim into having a greater bias in the favour of this cult and often with regard to specific races within the cult to use as proof of blood between their victim and the membership of this abusive ideology. That is how they propose to steal everything their victim creates because if they can imply that there's blood between the victim and the members of this cult, they can imply that they manipulated or controlled the victim into doing whatever it is this cult is trying to steal from them.

None of this post is "blue love" by the way. I say what I mean and mean what I say. The members of this cult call blue love piracy. They consider it the means by which they steal the cargo of other people, which is what the classical pirates between the 1300 and 1800s did.

So I am a Taoist and a Buddhist and as I said before, I don't believe in collective consciousness or the holy spirit where it divides me from the culture of my love interest. I don't play guitar by the way, so no blood paid guitar and as a matter of fact, no blood paid. I don't go by that at all.

I'm guessing that with this cult knowing that I'm a Taoist, they're trying to get me off balance. Essentially they're trying to polarize me to one side or the other, as a means of cow tipping me. I tend to have my feet on each side of any dualistic paradigm so that I may lean to one side or the other or maintain balance if I so choose.

I don't have a "Master" but rather I choose whose ideals and beliefs I respect and how I should humble myself before such people. Having a teacher, instructor or even a manager or leader is very much about trust.

What I said here also applies to women's rights as well, something I take seriously. I stated earlier that I didn't believe in the most common interpretation of Sumerian Tablets indicating that men received the genome of the Annunaki and that women received the genome of homo erectus or homo habilus in their creation myth. As soon as I understood the implications of what was said, I essentially spoke out. I don't think women are lesser than men and in fact, they came first. That's why men have nipples. There's no other explanation that would fit because nipples have no use for men, so men obviously did not come first.

Instead of just bashing the Bible, an essentially sacred Jewish text, I cited the reference to an equally old set of books (the Zohar) which refer to the divine feminine or female essence of God which is referred to as the Shekinah. I respect these Jewish texts but I obviously prefer the Zohar for its reference of the acknowledgement of the divine feminine. That's because blaming women for original sin is humankind's greatest failure. Then interpreting the Sumerian texts as regarding women as nothing more than animals compared to men who originated from outspace and who were essentially gods is equally wrong.

I'm not saying that I'm better than anyone else for expressing this point of view. The fact remains that most people of the cult abusing me had access to the same information and knowledge that I do. In fact they illegally eavesdrop just about everything I read or watch online and the reason that they do is so they can lay claim to anything I produce as a result of what I learn, though the fact is that they knew the same things and yet said nothing about it in women's defense. The only exception that I can think of in this regard is one of the people who raised me.

Its funny but now that the cat's out of the bag, everyone wants to claim that they said it or made me say it now that they know that there wasn't a serious risk in saying it. A risk that I took and take with everything I say and do. If it backfired on me, I'm certain that they'd have all backed off and just left the responsibility with me. When it shines, they want the credit.

Most men with whom I grew up (not all but most) are of the same ilk and likely would have come to a similar conclusion that I did. Whether they'd have opened their mouth about it is open for debate but I'd guess that most probably wouldn't but the fact that inside they likely feel the same way is really what counts because thats what makes the big difference in how women are regarded by men, and it has to start somewhere, making up for the wrongs that history committed against women. Its actually amazing how it seemed to come together for a lot of different people at roughly the same time, but I also guess that when it comes down to it, you need to have the courage to express what you mean despite the risks and do it the right way, rather than just bashing. I mean, a book like the Zohar whether you believe in Kabbalah or not had it right in the first place with regard to the divine feminine and it should have been that book that started us off with regard to women rather than the Talmud or Pentateuch. It might have saved a lot of oppression for them and once again that has nothing to do with whether anyone followed the religion of Kabbalah or not. Likely, Jewish mysticism of this nature was kept very well hidden and secret because there were many who would have scoffed at the idea of the divine feminine or at least saw it as a threat to the power structure. Even Yin Yang dualism sees things in this context, as the feminine was never lesser than the masculine in the Yin Yang of Chinese philosophy. I'd be willing to bet there's a treasure trove of hidden history with regard to ancient secret teachings of many cultures that regard the feminine as being divine or at the very least, an equal to the male aspect. The truth is that these teachings were likely kept secret because anyone following them would have likely been branded a heretic and possibly executed as a result. I'm guessing that the time is upon us where all of that will be undone and that women will finally be recognized and compensated for the attrocities of the past. Especially with regard to being branded with the blame for original sin.

In addition, it seems that this cult devours anything to do with my family. Yesterday morning morning they attempted to steal anything resulting from my communications with my family and friends through facebook. Shortly thereafter they attempted to transfer the identity of one of their cult members to me, in place of my own identity. As I've stated, its usually related to someone involved in crack cocaine, which I do not use. In fact, I don't use,buy or sell any narcotics whatsoever.

Brian Joseph Johns

200 Sherbourne Street #701
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5A 3Z5




PS: I don't work in the offices of the TCHC in 200 Sherbourne Street but rather I run my own upstart company from my apartment that is slowly being whittled away by abusive neighbours and members of the community. I have nothing to do with anyone nicknamed "Fudge" or "brown 15". That's obviously this cult trying to transfer someone else's activities onto my person.

Friday, April 5, 2019

To The People Out And About During My Travels...

Hi. Well here we go for another long winded post.

What I'd like to say is to all of the people out there in the city of Toronto, along Queen Street, on Parliament Street, at Value Village, at Dollarama and finally the LCBO and then on my way home north along Sherbourne Street up to apartment 701 at 200 Sherbourne Street where I live, all of you who showed sincere kindness, laughter, camaraderie and comedy, thank you. You've restored my faith in human kind.

To the ones who were treacherous and tried to push me to meanness and anger, well you're about done with me. I don't want to waste any more time on you than necessary.

It was great at the Value Village on Queen Street near Carlaw Avenue. I truly found some treasures which I was able to procure for a reasonable price and make my way home, dealing with the adversity along the way as best I could which is probably better than most in my position could.

So to those sincerely and truly good people who engendered friendship and kindness rather than spark hatred and hell, you left an impression upon me. I'll stick with what you gave me rather than focus upon the other side of that equation.

Maybe, just maybe, I'll continue writing despite cursing up and down that I'd never write again. I mean I really love writing A Lady's Prerogative and The Butterfly Dragon and Stories From The End. Not as avenues through which to vent, which I never use them for but more so as venues to lighten the pressure on others who don't always have a voice, or feel that they don't.

I've stated before that sometimes when you hear someone else speak up about a problem or issue that has affected you, it validates you and suddenly you don't feel so alone as you once may have been. That's the power of words and writing. Sure, they might not be action but they certainly have the power of action. Every declaration of war and every peace treaty ever signed was created with words, not to mention that they are the channels through which some of our most ancient knowledge is contained either through writing or oral tradition. Words have the power to save lives and to allow us to explore without the risk associated with action, and to learn from it as if we had taken action.

So thank you for your sincerely kind and encouraging words and encouragement those of you who expressed them and weren't so clinically detached from regarding me as a human being rather than a cow or robot to fuel the lives of your friends and colleagues.

Thank you from the bottom of my heart,

Oh and one last thing. Here's an image taken of the contribution that Shhhh! Digital has made to scientific research through World Community Grid to fight disease globally. I have computers running 24/7 crunching numbers for science and the fight against disease. This is something else that Shhhh! Digital is about. I actually have teams for A Lady's Prerogative and The Butterfly Dragon that contribute to research around the clock.

Here's the results from our World Community Grid contributions so far:

Brian Joseph Johns

200 Sherbourne Street #701
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5A 3Z5



Saturday, March 9, 2019

Worth A Read. Honest.

Hi. I live in 200 Sherbourne Street in apartment 701.

Its a low rise building in the south/south east quadrant of Toronto. Its low income housing. Its well kept and the in house staff are good. The security is good too but there's only on site security on week nights.

The contractors can anywhere between awesome to assholes. Maybe its that way everywhere but I don't think so. Heck, even I can be an asshole sometimes but if you are going to be, you'd better have a good reason because I'm hoping that nobody likes to be an asshole.

I believe in a world where everyone takes responsibility for their own actions. That way if you believe that what you are doing is right, you'll defend it.

If it is clearly wrong, you're more likely to hide it or at least own up to it and try to do better.

I'm a Taoist and a Buddhist.

I don't believe in god or the devil. For the most part I find those concepts to be the role of human collectives. I don't believe that god is a collective. I don't believe in the bible or the quran either and I am not a member of any religion that has a concept of Kane and Abel or Isaac and Ishmael or the Mark Of The Beast. I mean I love the Biblical account of the Exodus and the story of Moses, and certainly that of King Solomon and King David but I refuse to be part of any religion that divides people up according to Kane blood and Abel blood or denies people the right to heaven because they have the mark of the beast which to many religious people seems to mean an anxious or angry response to abuse.

I mean I believe that everyone should choose their own belief or religion (or none), but nobody should be able to force others to choose what they believe.

It seems to me that the world is slowly becoming enforced to join a collective of the mind, and that many are being held prisoners in their own minds and against the rule of law and their human rights.

It doesn't seem to me that this is something being done by the system, or the authorities and they're probably just as much at threat. I'm certain they'd be the first to defend the rights of others to choose their own beliefs. The second you deny someone that right, you are losing your own right to choose your belief as well.

Is it me or doesn't anyone else think that this is wrong? I mean enforced collectivism is slavery. Cooperation isn't. The most rapid growth of our civilization began when we started consensually cooperating, not maliciously enforcing collectivism. So if you don't like it, then stand against it. Change it! I mean I can't be the only one and as a matter of fact when I was out walking earlier, many many people subtly indicated their support. What would you want to bet that people doing that are doing so as a means of aggressive conversion, playing the opposite side to the religion that they want to convert everyone to. Prince Hall is like that. They're the mirror side of the Jehovah's Witnesses, and the two groups play off of each other as a form of aggressive conversion to their religion which has been outlawed in a number of countries as a result of the unrest it causes. You're imprisoned by one, and rescued by the other as long as you follow their mandate and beliefs. If you choose of your own free will and volition to believe in it, that's your freedom to do so. If others don't, then respect their freedom not to be a part of either side of that paradigm. We live in a country that operates under the rule of law and the human rights act and a backing Constitution.

I just got over days of abuse and harassment of the same nature and had begun the process of healing. I had a group of people begin to attack me at about 1:15am tonight. Some people who'd come in from the street up to my floor and did their harassment from the hallway. I know its cold outside but if you want a warm place to stay, the last thing that you should do is sneak in and start conflict. I guess if I had gotten up and chased them out or called security on them, I'd be on the hate side of the fence and left to wallow in my own misery.

Brian Joseph Johns
Not to mention, I'd signed a petition for only a few hours earlier. You know, I'd really like to see support from for members of the European and Asian communities as well. I've signed just about every single one of their petitions supporting rights for Women across the board, but there has never been a petition that has specifically included support for European and Asian Women. That's a large demographic of people who need our support as well. Then there's also North and South America too. And we can't forget Oceania as well. I'll definitely address a kind but assertive letter to them to encourage that possibility.

The point is that none should be overshadowed for any reason. When it comes to human rights, bias has no place. When it comes to private matters of relationship and affection, bias is everything. Support of human rights is not bias for a relationship as supporting someone else's rights isn't an application to have a date with them or to sleep with them. Relationships and romance is all about bias. In fact, that's all we have to express for our partners and our right to bias and protecting it should be a part of our human rights as well.

I mean, if someone tricks you into a situation where your bias is elusively more than it is for someone that you purport to care for, that doesn't mean that you are no longer in a relationship with the consenting person you care for and are now in a relationship with the one for whom you were tricked into elusively having more bias. Not at all. That's slavery and an attempt of ownership too and there are people who try things of that nature. Making it into a hidden game they sometimes target against someone. I mean having enough time to plan and execute a game like that against someone must be a living hell! I mean I can't imagine a large group of people having that much time to waste on doing that to a naive, innocent or any kind of person. Maybe that's the top of the bottom? Like the heaven in hell?

As I've said, its not like I'm racist at all but I don't like being targeted by specific groups of people. As a matter of fact, a few years ago I started writing a story about the early beginnings of Jazz music in New Orleans. From the point I'd started writing the story, publishing it as I went, I was literally harassed and attacked by members of these groups despite the fact that the majority of the cast were African Americans and French Louisiana colonials, which coincides with much of the early history of Jazz in New Orleans. The story was called The Answer Is In The Keys. Actually it is from these French and Latin colonials that the Creole language originates in New Orleans. I've been to the Big Easy but unfortunately I was only a "little easy" being nine years old. I didn't get to see the great Jazz shows they had at night, but I did manage to hear a lot of music from the hotel room and while walking the streets with my family during the day.

There wasn't any real cliche or stigma associated with the story and as per usual I made my characters deep, interesting and intelligent yet I was abused by these same people. So I scapped the entire story and took it down from my website at that time: I encourage Women not to accept abuse. I mean purposeful targeted abuse against their person. So why should I accept the same thing and why when it does happen, verbal or otherwise? Should I reward the people who abuse me by continuing whatever it is they're abusing me for? That creates a cycle that constantly repeats itself, so Women, don't reward abuse, and remember to enforce no means no if that is of your choosing and intent.

Brian Joseph Johns too.
I'd posted many a good photos of my city of Toronto, trying to build up some positive energy for the city. I'm not a member of any hate ideology as I believe in calm and balance of mood and mind. If you go extreme in anything, you have to do it in balance and at your own pace lest you get bowled over by extremity.

I mean be careful of the see-saw response. That's a natural human response in most people if not all of them that results when confronted with a situation of polar extremity. Almost always most people respond with the opposite. In this way some people intend to play you and much like a see-saw, the higher the one side pushes the higher the other side goes. So if someone is trying to dethrone your peace and calm, that's likely the strategy they'll use. In fact that seems to be taking on a monkey see/monkey do phenomenology throughout society, whereby one group of people learns to do this after seeing another group of people
doing it and it runs out of control from there.

I'd be willing to bet that this is the method behind radicalization that has been resulting in violent attacks throughout North America and Europe though they seem to have died down for the time thankfully but that doesn't mean that they've disappeared. I mean if you're on an emotional see-saw with other people, they could push the see-saw a little harder than you could handle and off the handle you go! Maybe an angry outburst? Maybe run out to your garage and grab a firearm and just start shooting people? Maybe you might experience this too many times and plan an organized assault, trying to target the same people you believe to be responsible for putting you through it? That's likely the scenario from these situations.

Most of those situations arise out of other people using our secrets as puppet strings against us. Another form of unspoken slavery. I mean if someone wants to "Geppetto" you, they only need access to your secrets. For most people that means having their Internet spied upon or their communications device channels intercepted. Mind reading and ESP too. I mean if our brains are electrochemical circuits, that means that all of our thoughts produce an electromagnetic field. Whats to stop someone else's brain from intercepting that and reinterpreting that information? I mean if you can do that, then what would stop you from intercepting the magnetic field of someone hearing their own voice while talking. I mean we're making devices that respond to our thoughts and they're doing the exact things I just described. I'd be willing to bet that our brains and nervous system can do the exact same thing too. So there's a whole range of means through which our secrets can end up in the hands of people who will use them as puppet strings against us. It doesn't really matter the morality of the nature of your secret, though I expect that depending upon its severity it is probably very unsettling to have someone with your secrets, and then to hint to you that they know them, perhaps purposely so as to manipulate you.

I'd be willing to bet that for many people this is a potential stress killer. This could be the method to the Mafia's word of death. Hint at secrets whose very expression demands explanation. It is by these means that they'd build stress and perhaps burst an artery or strain the heart and its the end.

Some religions might even use this as a means of extraction from people. Perhaps alright for expert interrogators trying to find a murderer or obtain a confession but in the hands of the malicious that could be a very dangerous power to wield. Hence I'd suggest to anyone to not be worried about their own secrets unless you are a murderer, vicious or even calm and silent criminal. The reason is that this kind of power has a profound effect to shape us in dangerous ways. I mean if someone can pressure you about the secret of having read a specific book, maybe a controversial one like Catcher In The Rye, then what are the chances that they might try to condition you not to read certain kinds of books? Books that expanded your thinking enough to challenge the kind of people who'd try to cull your reading habits?

I'm not writing this for that particular reason. I mean I really don't care what people know about what I have read and what I haven't. If I did, then someone could really change the course of my reading, meaning they could limit me only to reading books that supported a specific religion, or maybe books that espoused the ideals of a specific ideology. I don't think my secrets are more important than my freedom to choose my path of education and exploration in life. I'd hope that anyone else would feel the same way too. The best way to take away the power of anyone's war cabinet in that regard is to be at peace with yourself and even be unafraid to explain yourself if someone does attempt to destabilize you.

Remember that the kind of people who do that are exactly like the kind of people who try to wield power over others based upon Kane and Abel. That means they believe that you have the right to heaven if and only if you aren't possessed of reactive or violent blood and such people usually set the terms of such a test themselves. So that means they're in control of who gets to go to heaven and who doesn't. Having that kind of power over someone tends to corrupt. So the people who'd use your secrets in that way are no better because they're trying to use them to limit you and to control you. In other words to have power over you to determine your future.

Really this post is the culmination of reworking the vitriol of posts I'd been making in response to being a victim of stalking and social abuse. I managed to stand back enough and piece it together while whittling away the embedded anxiety and came up with much of this. It reads much better and is free of anxiety spurred writing while still having some of the same spark that ignited it.

Anyway, I hope that someone got something out of that. I did in writing it and I just barely managed to avoid writing another long winded vitriol post and instead turned out something valuable and good that isn't even fiction.

Warning To Content Creators!

A warning to content creators everywhere. There are people who will try to destroy your brand by stalking and abusing you in public and while not under the scrutiny of a camera or recording device. Instead their abuse is geared towards causing you to spiral out of control and rant online in such a way that will destroy you and your content brand or worse, attempt to weaponize you into attempting to destroy someone else's content brand.

Have you noticed how many content producers have ended up in conflict with one another? I'd say that digital, film, online and broadcast media is under attack. As a matter of fact, I'd include many aspects of our society that are under attack, including ones that helped to defend our sovereignty and our ideals in representation of our role in the United Nations. I'm talking about our Military. It would appear that we're being played against each other. A sort of divisive bifurcation that is separating us  into ever smaller sub-groups, many of whom are at war with one another. I know. I almost fell for the whole thing, hook line and sinker myself.

The smaller brands need to help one another and when possible, team up with the bigger brands while making sure that nobody is sabotaging your media presence and character. Often such people will attempt to rile you up using the see-saw method I've described here. They're exploiting the natural reaction we have when confronted to present the opposite. As I said in the see-saw example from above, the harder one side pushes, the higher the other side goes. When this is referring to our emotional state, that means you can be pushed to anxiety or anger by this method, and both can serve to put you into situations where you'll really misrepresent yourself and the interests of your brand. I'd highly recommend that you avoid feeling vengeful too. That doesn't lead anywhere but to more see-saw treatment, only this time the see-saw is vengeance.

As I stated above, it is this exact methodology that has likely resulted in many violent attacks throughout North America and Europe. The only difference with how we're being played as people is the extremity with which we react to the see-saw method.

Insofar as content producers go, no matter how honest and hard working you are at what you do, there are people who will spy on your market penetration statistics and if they feel so inclined, they'll stalk and harass you as a means to destroy your brand or outright steal it from you and give it to someone closer to their ideology.

Please. I urge you to be careful and not just for my sake, please do make a stand against this. Don't let other people define what colours mean for you unless you're choosing by your own freewill to go along with it.

Their interpretation is subjective. Any colour can mean love, even more than one at a time and for some people, they all do. That's up to you. Don't let anyone take that away from you and remember that it is the Armed Forces that have ultimately protected those rights for us many times over. Our savior green protecting every one of our colours, even other greens.

One last thing. Despite my having created a Butterfly Dragon character that I've used on DC Universe Online, my book and the characters of The Butterfly Dragon are NOT affiliated with nor a part of the DC Universe though the DC Universe is excellent content and the home of some of my favourite superhero brands, namely Superman, Wonder Woman, Batman, Aqua Man and the Joker (perhaps the first iconic villain). More recently I am looking forward to seeing Shazam. That really looks it is going to be really good.

Likewise, the Marvel Universe, the incredible brainchild of Stan Lee, Jack Kirby and many others including the legendary John Romita and Tod McFarlane is the home of some of my favourite heroes including Iron Man, Spiderman, Captain (Ms) Marvel, The Hulk, The Black Widow, Lady Deathstrike, The Thing, Wolverine, The Avengers, Ghost Rider, Wolverine, Werewolf By Night, Kung Fu Master, Moon Knight, Punisher, Dr. Doom, Silver Surfer, Galactus and so many more that it would take me the whole night to finish naming them here. My characters of Shhhh! Digital Media unfortunately are not a part of the Marvel Universe either though I'd be hard pressed to pick which one I'd like to see them unite with.

The Butterfly Dragon, A Lady's Prerogative, Pleromaworld, The Legendary Of Xarn and Stories From The End are all a part of the SMU: The Shhhh! (Digital) Media Universe.

I'd rather the SMU be a third macro-universe in the multiverse that could interact with either the Marvel Universe or the DC Universe. I only have one stipulation and that is that I believe that it is wrong for comics to sell any particular religion. I don't mean that it is wrong to have religious characters in a fictional world.

I mean in my A Lady's Prerogative books, the Sanctum is composed of close to thirty or forty different forms of mystic belief. Some based upon those of our real world though with their own spin (much like Neil Gaiman's Sandman and American Gods which none of my books draw from), while others are completely original. None of them are sold as the one true answer because for any one of us, that's subjective as should be the yardstick by which one measures oneself. I tend to lean towards diversity in that arena, even keeping my own chosen faiths (of Taoism and Buddhism) in a lower key role within any of the series of books that I write. Nothing I write is a device for conversion to my religion or to any religion for that matter.

I mean if a God (or Goddess more likely) who created us, gave us freewill, then why would we be forced into any particular religion at all and told that all others are wrong? Do we even need to choose a religion? What's the rush? From a young age (I mean from our early teens), we only need to start with learning about and understanding our independence of mind and the confidence to make our own decisions and to be ready for the responsibility that those decisions incur, remembering that not everyone has our best intentions in mind and that some may try to trick you into contradicting your own integrity. Having that we'll eventually gravitate towards the place in the world that best suits us. Keep in mind that all of this is far easier said than done and I can attest to that personally but retrospection is our greatest learning tool.

Don't let others take any of what you say or do away from you via colour symbolism or by any means. Those things will help you to grow.

Now I'm off to enjoy some East Asia alien asparagus magnolia porn.

I am Brian Joseph Johns and this is

200 Sherbourne Street #701
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
M5A 3Z5